The Hemangioblastoma Research Project · primary outcome: lifetime surgical procedures

Fewer surgeries in a lifetime.
That’s the outcome we fund.

VHL (von Hippel–Lindau disease) is a genetic condition that can cause benign or malignant tumors in up to 10 different organs across a person’s life. In the brain and spine, hemangioblastomas are the leading cause of death and disability, and the complication people with VHL fear most. Managing them means a lifetime of surgeries, accumulating neurological deficits, a constant psychological toll and a steadily eroding quality of life. Yet the research that could change this receives only a small fraction of the field’s attention.

Closing that gap is what the project is for. We publish a research agenda for hemangioblastomas of the brain and spine, lead and partner on the studies it calls for, and fund the ones that move the field forward.

DEATHS · 336-PATIENT COHORT
66%
caused by CNS hemangioblastoma. Renal cell carcinoma is no longer an independent predictor of survival; CNS hemangioblastoma is.
REGISTERED DRUG TRIALS
165 : 1
kidney versus hemangioblastoma. Publications 19:1 all-time, 30:1 in the last three years, and widening.
APPROVED SYSTEMIC AGENTS
16 vs 1
for renal cell carcinoma since 1992, against one for CNS hemangioblastoma: belzutifan, 2021.
AFTER SPINAL SURGERY · VHL
22%
needed walking assistance or a wheelchair at last follow-up, against 4% of sporadic patients. Most of the VHL group (70%) had already had brain surgery; the burden is cumulative.

Sources: Zhou 2019 · PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov, queried 12 Oct 2026 · FDA approval notifications and NCCN Kidney Cancer guidelines · NIH RePORTER · Takeshima 2023 · Sundaram 2025 · every number, sourced →

Stake in the ground

One goal anchors everything we fund: that people with VHL undergo as few surgical procedures as possible in a lifetime.

To fix the imbalance, the Rath Family Foundation is committing $3 million over the next three years to research on brain and spine hemangioblastoma, with $3–10 million of venture capital behind any result that starts to look like a therapy. The number of surgical procedures in a lifetime is the most important outcome variable we look at, and the one we fund for. Tumor shrinkage, response rate and progression-free survival matter to us only as far as they predict that number. No VHL trial has ever used surgery-free survival as its primary endpoint, or counted lifetime procedures as recurrent events, even though, in the only patient survey of its kind, 47% of patients named fewer surgeries as their top treatment goal and 73% would take a pill that might delay one. Making lifetime surgical procedures measurable, reproducible and improvable is the first job.

01 — The imbalance

We have made extraordinary progress on kidney cancer. The brain and spine never got the same attention.

A single operation is survived with function largely preserved, and the surgeons who do them are excellent. The burden is what accumulates across a lifetime of operations. Nobody has ever measured that burden.

The full evidence →
Reproducible queries run 12 October 2026 against PubMed and the ClinicalTrials.gov API; funding from NIH RePORTER. Every figure is sourced on the imbalance.
MeasureKidneyHemangioblastomaRatio
Interventional drug trials ever registered1,65410165 : 1
Published clinical trials2,2572590 : 1
Publications, 2024–20269,19731030 : 1
NIH funding, FY2024–25 combined$151.0M$1.4M107 : 1
Industry trials ever listing it as a condition (2003, 11 patients)—1—
02 — What the project does · $3 million committed over three years

$3 million over three years, directed by the agenda. Not a mailbox for grant applications.

Most of the people who could do this work are renal-cell-carcinoma researchers with full programs. Asking them to write hemangioblastoma proposals cold would produce relabeled kidney work. So the project sets the agenda, finds the labs and cohorts already positioned to answer each direction, and brings the money to the question.

Publish the agenda

Six tracks and 45 directions for the brain and spine compartment, each with a confidence tier and the cheapest test that would advance or kill it. Fourteen are verified absences: things never measured, published or attempted. Circulated as a draft so it can be corrected before it is acted on.

Direct and partner

For each direction we identify who already holds the cohort, the tissue, the archive or the method, and commission the specific experiment. Most cost under $75,000 — several cost nothing — and need no new patients.

Fund what moves it

Commissioned work, partnerships and inbound proposals at $100,000–$500,000 per award with a decision inside 60 days, no equity and no IP claim. $3–10 million of venture capital stands behind any result that starts to look like a therapy.

03 — Research agenda · working draft v1.8

Six initial tracks and directions

Track I · 5

Measurement and endpoints

Three compartments reported separately. Surgery-free survival. A safe-to-watch model.

Track II · 5

Tissue, models, sampling gap

Bank progressor tissue. One dual-label stain settles six leads at once.

Track III · 4

Contradictions left standing

HIF-1α: driver or suppressor. SSTR2A: 40/43 or 0/112. Target engagement: never measured.

Track IV · 6

Optimizing the existing drug

Intermittent dosing, UGT2B17 genotyping, a combination tolerable for forty years.

Track V · 12

New axes from other fields

PlGF for the cyst, NOX4, MIF, CXCR4, pocket-independent HIF-2α removal.

Track VI · 13

Therapeutics for hemangioblastoma

Does the drug reach the lesion. Six synthetic-lethal targets never checked here. Radioligands, where dose is the question.

Highest-leverage item

One dual-label stain on archived hemangioblastoma tissue assigns six candidate targets to tumor cell or vessel. About $40–75K, sixteen weeks, no new patients. It promotes or eliminates six leads at once.

Direction 7 →
04 — Case study · Patient TR

Why we need better outcome metrics for VHL: RECIST may be just one data point.

Five lesions responded in ways no one disputes, and two millimeter-scale sentinels never changed. The eighth — the largest — was called “growing” on every conventional read for five years, while the tissue inside it may tell a different story. On that reading, a measurement convention rather than biology is what steers a person toward an operation.

Read the case study →
Four readings of the same lesion over the same interval: maximum diameter up 16 percent and whole-tumor volume up 68 percent, while integrated cellular mass fell 17 percent and the dense cellular core fell 67 percent. The first two readings are plotted in red, the last two in green.
Four readings of one lesion over one treatment interval. Red is what conventional size assessment measures — maximum diameter and whole-tumor volume. Green is what the tissue-level imaging measures show — integrated cellular mass and the dense cellular core.

If you hold a cohort, an archive, a platform or a question, we want to hear about it. Corrections are worth more to us than agreement.

Propose work or a partnership
Where this started

A family with thirty years of VHL, and a field that can fix this.

The project grew out of a large donation already in process from the Rath Family Foundation to the Iliopoulos Laboratory at Massachusetts General Hospital (Harvard Medical School), and out of twenty-five years of talking with people who have VHL. In those conversations, almost everyone fears repeated brain and spinal surgery far more than their renal disease. The deficits they carry from those tumors and operations are the largest burden we have seen in this disease, and one the field has measured poorly.

The project is structured so other funders, labs and families can join at the same rung. It is the first of the rare disease pools at rarepools.com.

On this site
  • 01The imbalance — the evidence that research and funding for brain and spine hemangioblastoma are out of balance with the kidney, and what patients carry.
  • 02Research agenda — six tracks, 45 directions, each with a confidence tier and its cheapest test. Working draft, circulated for correction.
  • 03How we fund — $3 million over three years: directed partnerships, commissioned experiments, inbound proposals, and the venture tier behind them.
  • 04Case study — Patient TR: eight lesions over five years, and why diameter can report progression in a lesion that may be responding.
  • 05Research — a growing library: the project’s papers and working drafts, published as they are written.